Sex On Television

He's still trying to figure out how to watch TV without a remote. Some of us just didn't join the rest of us in the 21st century

i.e. ok boomer

 

'Murcia prides itself on being a "Christian nation". Aren't other countries just as religious? Going topless at a beach in France is pretty normal, but in the US it's considered a sin, and one can be fined.

 

as for me, I'm just against the extremes in anything including the thing under discussion

 

Most of that crap is pretend, just like the rest of the film, it's why it's "acting" none of it, is real.
but they do have movies where the actors don't act regarding that, they actually do it on screen.
and those are old ass movies lmao not the current ones of this generation.

 

Actually, being topless in New York State is legal, so long as the display is not lewd in nature. It's been a law since at least the mid 90s. What's considered lewd is up for interpretation, I guess.
Now if NYS could only do something about those inane recreational marijuana laws...

 

Yes, sex sells, and I resent that. I also resent my hypocrisy of being sold it from time to time too. It's the most pleasant experience two or more people can have with each other and should be given freely (without inhibition as much as without cost). Everyone has the right to do with it what they wish and I stand firmly behind that. But to bag it and tag it cheapens it, denies the profound specialness of it and disregards the pleasure of connectedness and togetherness beyond the orgasm.
To go back to the original topic (I get passionate about sex sometimes!) I don't also think there should specifically be a ban on displaying sex whether genuine or acted. Sometimes sex is an integral part of a story. It's kind of like bleeping out the word "shit" in a Pink Floyd song. The group had David Gilmour and Roger Waters, not Beavis and Butthead.
I will concede displays of sexual activity are inappropriate to folks in a certain age range. Every effort should be made to shield such eyes from explicit PDAs.

 

Is that all coastal states or just the one where you live?

 

I remember when they advertised Marlboro cigarettes and Schlitz beer on television commercials.

 

Showing sex and violence to kids is immoral and degenerate.

Kids should be raised on mario not pornography. No child of mine is getting an Iphone, I will give them a SNES and ban the M rated games.

Once a boy becomes 13 he has reached the age where he has became a man. At that point he is free to watch pornography or play M rated games if he wants. 13 is around the age where tesosterone causes uncontrollable sex drive in males so it doesn't make sense for him to be censored from porns.

As for that dentist office, i'd call the cops cops give them a warning, if they do it again the give them a citation, maybe fines and fees. If it wasn't the dentist office fault then its the TV stations fault if the TV listed the program as G rated.

there are grey areas where like in Pokemon there is a scene where James has inflatable boobs. As long as there is no nudity that's fine I guess. Might have a side effect of causing kids to develop a sex drive prematurely and or make them trans. Maybe some anime scenes should just be for teens. I support teen HRT, but at least 50% of the teen population must reproduce to continue the breeding stock of a nation. If 90% of teens are fully trans society will collapse, (unless we have strong robot population to help augment the population). So maybe there can be more alternatives such as effeminate males and no longer bullying/shunning effeminate males from society, this will allow some males to just be feminine males in society and less likely of 90% of teens demanding SRS.

 

So---depressed people should have guns and 13 year olds should view pornography. You need help. Serious help.

 

Typical leftist normie who can't think outside of the primitive social constraints and dogmas of mainstream modernity.

Meanwhile 2 days from now you will probably go on some other outlet and rage at randoms and call them "fascists", when you yourself don't believe in freedom either.

If my child turns 13 I am not gonna be some gestapo that monitors everything they do on the computer. Its normal for teenage boys to browse pornography, unless you are still living in the 1800s. And its not my job to micromanage and police everything they do with their life. Once 13 they should have the freedom to make their own decisions.

I also said that children under 13 should not be permitted to watch media containing sex or violence. Yet I don't get credit or kudos for saying that either. If anything, leftists would do a 180 then bitch and moan about that and tell me I have no right to police people about that either. Can't win with the hysterical left.

Second of all, I don't understand why the left is so obsessed with treating mentally ill folks as 2nd class citizens and denying them rights. Not very progressive if you ask me. They act shocked when I say mentally ill folks should have the right to defend themselves from criminals. When they hear this they act like they just stepped on a lego or something.

 

Sometimes what's written should be left ignored.

 

Typical leftist normie--yup--that's me. hahahahahaha. Have a nice day.

 

NO.................