If the government doesn't have anything to hide about the pentagon attack, why don't they exploit the hell out of it like they do the World Trade Center Attack, its obvious, because there is something to hide, if everyone started talking about the pentagon attack, more people would begin to watch videos of the attack, and read up about it, and begin to question what really happened, so they keep the pentagon attack quiet. Peace and Love, Dan
I cant make any sense of that post. I think what hes trying to say is, "I dont know what hit the pentagon." Yeah I think a UFO hit it too.
i thought we resolved this. but thestoon is right. 757's don't make noise, silly people. tha afterburners on jets arnt on constantly, stoon. those pictures came from controled media, and it's good to know we have a pentagon security camera expert on hand. maybe a plane did crash into the pentagon. who really cares? the thing that bothers me is that we don't know who did it, and we never will. it could have very well been our own people on that plane. it could have been terrorists. we'll never know. that's why this issue has been resolved. "Unsolved Mystery" if you will. There's too much that we simply can't know. It could have been a plane, it could have been a missle.
My new theory is Bush and chaney got really drunk one night, took the ole pick up truck out for some donuts on the pentagon lawn, lost control, and accidently hit the pentagon.
Snopes.com has already issued this as a hoax. hoax or not, the fact that there was no wreckage at the pentagon raises an eyebrow.There were 2 wreckages at the WTC and one in Pennsylvania. my real concern is....if the hijacked plane didnt crash into the pentagon, where is it? there was a 4th plane with like 80 people on it hijacked..that plane carried Frasier producer David Angel and Bill Maher's friend...that one journalist lady who's name escapes me. What happened to that plane? does anyone care? I do.
"why don't they exploit the hell out of it like they do the World Trade Center Attack?" Oh that might be because the number of people who died in the Pentagon strike was a tiny fraction of the number that died in the towers.
i didnt see the film...does anyone have another link for it...http://black-tactics.com/penta.swf ....doesnt work
I always wondered the validity of an airplane striking the pentagon since 2001... I think it would be rather tough to hit such a low rising building, and the way the building was damaged, it looked like the plane had to go in at an angle, and if that was the case, the pilot had to crash land into the building just right on its way down, no flying next to the ground. anyone know where I can find this video?? the site you posted seems to have exceeded its bandwidth, and I cant find it on ebaumsworld..... could someone post a link? please
It is no longer on ebaumsworld. http://ebaumsworld.com/pentagon.html There is nothing to worry about, the video never existed. Have a nice day.
i did recently see a documentary about 9/11. a tv documentary. and they showed many computer simulations of the plane hiting the pentagon. an i must say from that my thoughts have swung slightly. the only questionable acts were the plane flying so low and the dodgy government 'cover up'-like way of dealing with it. but if a plane hit the lower floor of the building at close to 500mph, your talking about it taking close to 1/10 of a second to get passed the first wall. all the other concrete at various other angles would eaisly tear the thin alliminum of the plane into what ever sizes it can. what your left with is a million tiny bits of metal strung all over building 1 and 2. then the buildings collapsed onto the metal, covering it up. which would make it even harder to detect from the internet. but still, if this is the case. why dont they just release one of the many videos that Actually prove it!?
Its the man covering up a UFO hitting the pentagon I tell you. There were little grey alien bodys strewn all over the place.\ Sorry about that I quit taking the thread seriously pages ago, because no amount of data I presented was never good enough for lickherish. Because he was there and knows what happend. But what you said is prolly the most accurate statement on here.
Simply put Andrew, you presented no "data" and certainly not in any verifiable evidentiary fashion as have those who prefer to acknowledge the glaring inconsistencies and implausibilities with which you are happy to continue deluding yourself. All youve offered is your own repeated opinion which in no way addresses the substantive analyses presented by myself and others which show that indeed no 757 (and certainly not one piloted by any hijacker incapable of flying so much as a piper cub) hit that building. Whether or not you are prepared to wake up and comprehend the role 9/11 plays in making possible all this administration has planned long before even taking office (the bulk of whom are simply returning to previous posts regardless of prior abuses of power), the fact remains that no thorough investigation has ever been allowed by this cabal for fear that the truth of the matter would cut through their media fed smokescreen and leave them facing charges of treason before a highly shamed population of willfully blind sheep.
What a wonderfully enclosed little world of self justification you must dwell in. Stay smugly wrapped in your unquestioning groupthink mentality. After all, the military complex has invested hours of indoctrination and conditioning in you to quelch any annoying tendencies to question the political realities for which you might one day be called to lay down your life. God forbid you should realise just how much of your supposed "patriotic" duty is mere PR to mask the uglier truth that you serve to protect global corporate hegemony, not the wellbeing of "our nation". Carry on little soldier...
I just wouldn't respond to posts like that, Lick...Kinda reminds me of the annoying things my little sister would say when we were younger, and if you just ignored her she would shut up and go away.
I realise, but the willful surrender of rational scrutiny of clear and systemic abuses of power simply gets my goat. I cant help but continue to rebuke those who presume to be intelligent and yet fail to see how acquiescent they have become to a corrupt status quo. I shall endeavour to ignore him and his ilk henceforth.
Get mad! Get mad! *pokes LickHERish with a stick* LickHERish I was intoxicated post before last, I was just havin fun with ya. No need to get your feathers all ruffled up.
Disreguard the previous post. Anyway, god forbid, I pay attention to the facts, and not be easilly coaxed into a random persons propaghanda. God forbid, I look at the situation, and say, hmmm a plane hit the twin towers, why wouldnt a plane hit the pentagon? A plane hit the pentagon bottom line. It was just crushed into little peices. Ya know I guess im just not as gullible as you. Maybe you hide behind your big words, and dumbass false media propaghanda because your in reality, a boring old man who just sits around reading the dictionary all day, to try to say things that sound intellegent, when in reality your saying the same thing a 14 year old that just wandered into the thread said. Anyway. I dont like it when anyone attacks my JOB. Its not my duty its my JOB. Somthing I do to support myself. I dont wanna go to iraq, My finacee doesn't want me to either, but if i go, I go because its my job. Im not brainwashed im just rational. I don't buy into every conspiracy theory that comes onto the INTERNET. "I guess since its on the internet its gotta be right?!?" And dont expect a response too soon, I have to go to work. Ive been brainwashed to be punctual. Wait thats just standard work ethic.