So, I am an empath.

You are talking about the occupations of robbers and thieves. The genuine economy recognizes giving and receiving to be an identical event.

 

I can see the identity in the fact that giving implies receiving, so seems feasible enough. But what exactly is this genuine economy you're talking about? The genuine economy I perceive is made up of people who aren't really concerned about what they're exactly apart of, especially not enough to form such an opinion on the identity of giving and receiving..

 

We live in a world of condition. It takes two for a condition to be met. It is always you and your guide.

 

I guess what I was saying there, can more easily be expressed by the common phrase, "Shit happens". You say, nothing becomes apart of your experience without your whole consent. I say, well what do you say to "Shit happens." , that seems to contradict your truth. Your mom dying can become of apart of your experience tomorrow, chances are you didn't consent to that, it just happened.

 

It is not, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. (1+-1=0)
It is, all actions are equal. (1+1=2).
The first example is of stasis, no movement, no growth. The second example is of fruitfulness. Multiplication is quick addition. We do not advance by littering the world with fat carcasses.






-

 

Forgive me for intruding on this, the most holy of threads, for great merriment and lollery has it given me. i have not the courage to profane its sacred waters with my clumsy pebbles of thought, i only wish to bow to you all, through text.

 

How do you measure an event?

 

For heavens sake dude, get in here and bump uglies.

 

Let's do it, me and you, in the closet, right now.

I'll fractalize your euphemism so cosmically that empathetic energy will blossom from your thatness

 

You make my mouth wet.

 

That's probably still the stuff in your teeth, well at least it's sweet

 

Measurement.. all I know is, big and small, good and bad, up and down, left and right, right and wrong, are all in the mind, and defined differently by each individual if such concepts are still needed. I feel what you said is over generalized which is why I am merely suggesting that anything can become apart of your experience whether you would like it to or not, whether you expect it or not. You don't even get a chance to accept (consent) to what comes until it happens, so how can you say "nothing" can come into your experience without your consent?

 

Those who might call me profound, had just met their own depth.

 

Over generalized means not specifically applied in every instance. My courtesy does not extend to some only, but to all.

 

I better not catch you extending courtesies to other people, you can't go through what we just went through in the closet (very courteous indeed) and pretend nothing happened

even if that statement is technically ontologically correct

 

Yes but we are speaking of your experience, not your courtesy. Converting what you said to logic, it forms: If it's part of my experience, then it is with my whole consent. Though I feel as though anything can become of ones experience without their whole consent, so it seems as though what you said isn't necessarily true, anyway. The only reason I bothered to drag this on this far is because you seem to apart of the few who don't mind having such a technical discussion, and I'm sure you wouldn't mind to learn you were mistaking, if you are.

 

I have no wish to be deceived and we but waste time if we do not go beyond what we have learned, to what is yet to be learned, so I am tireless of this occupation.

 

Nah man I ain't trying to deceive you or anything, I could very well be wrong. Fine with me to cease the subject. I originally had asked what made you call your bluff, the will thing has been a tricky subject in my own life and has been a common theme amongst teachings I pursue, a theme I don't quite fully understand as of yet. You ever read A Course in Miracles?

 

I have read it yes. Did not mean to suggest you were trying to deceive, just telling you that yes, I do not mind falling down to learn a new way of standing up.

 

Had it impacted you in any way? I feel like the book splits me in 5 different directions some times.