there was a study done not too long ago, and i appologize if it was already brought up. anyway, the people putting on the study showed porn to a group of men and a group of women, under the assumption that men are more "visual." they hooked them up to instruments that measured signs of arousal, such as sweaty palms. there was no difference in sexual response between the men and the women! although many of the women in the group claimed they were not aroused, they actually were! so the study concluded that men are not more visual than women. women do not, "require more than naked hot flesh" to be aroused. they may claim otherwise, but their hard nipples, dilated pupils, sweaty palms, and slippery undies will testify otherwise. man may be more interested in finding visual stimuli, but that does not mean that women are any less aroused by the eye-candy they come across.
yup just talking about it gets me going. hehehe. i mean why do you think that they make movies and throw in a hot sex scene that has absolutely nothing to do with the movie at all whatsoever. women most certainly do like to watch people get it on. the difference for me personally is, i don't like seeing naked people dancing around flinging their whoody whoos at me. that isn't a turn on. just doesn't seem as natural as watching people making love.
LOL-cutelildeadbear "whoody whoos" I've been suprised by the deep and open thoughts on this subject. Cool bunch of ladies. Been thinking about the visual thing, lawn girl. Perhaps what you say is true. Men are however, more likely to seek out visual stimuli.
i would love it if my guy asked me to go to a strip club with him they are so much fun plus the fact its just so arrousing
My hubby said that he doesn't go because why pay a total stranger when he can give his money to me and I can do the same thing for him... plus some. LOL But it wouldn't bother me either way because we would go together.