Did you take a look at the sources, many of the people are very well read, intelligent, and respectable people. Yes, that is true... you make a very good point... anyone could potentially lie just to get them on their side... Even the president... that is what this movement is about, screw... we arent trying to convert ppl to any side... we realize we dont know the truth, we realize that there is much more to find out and many questions to ask still.. I think there is a high probability but I dont know completely. The professors who started 9-11 truth arent profitting off of it... there is no point on getting people on "your side" when the only thing you are calling for is an investigation to whatever is the truth. We arent demanding our side is true, we are just asking to find out so we can put it to rest.
Personaly i think it is a bit late in the day for anyone to be changing the majority of their 'minds'.. Every 'new' angle always seems to end up in the old 'angles' eventualy.. *sigh*. Not that was a bit below the buckle
I appreciate that, 'both sides' have a equal amount of 'very well read, inteligent, and respectable people'...... So.
So lets find out who is telling the truth and who is lying? Hey I know its kinda harsh, i know not all texans are fucking stupid... but a lot of them are... especially the stereotypical ones.. Hell, I dont come on hipforums to be an Angel... dont act like you never "act like an idiot" -- i think we all do -- weren't you just criticizing me for being white and respecting malcolm x? I think that's idiotic... but idiocy is very relative. At least you responded well in that thread... lots of posts are 'below the belt'... you can discredit me coz im a commie and ill make fun of texans... its all equally idiotic.
More and more brilliant new work is appearing that shreds the "official story" and Kean Commission cover-up (see especially Griffin's "9/11 Commission Report," Thompson's "Terror Timeline," Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon," Lance's "Cover-up," Ahmed's "War on Truth") Millions of Americans now recognize that the studied deception we've seen in our war policy, the Congress, and recent elections are parts of a pattern that started much before the lies about Saddam's WMDs. More opponents and victims of the neocon agenda are finally realizing that its unholy alliance of corporate wealth and vote-rich fundamentalism may be invincible unless we can dispel the fearful ignorance it feeds on. Not with that site Mui. As you seem intrested in 'finding the truth' why not set up your own website. I would be happy to add my limit understandings of all this , that i have gathered over the years.
most people are stupid in general. what does being from Texas have to do with anything? and whats the stereotypical Texan? you probly think we actually ride horses and wear cowboy hats huh. you can go ahead and stereotype my state if you want and look like an idiot. im not gonna even gonna argue with anyone anymore on these forums about where im from and how people are here. screw
if i opened my own website up, mind I could, mind one is in the process, mind ive been in labour with it its about... 6 days old... I dont have the resources to put on a movement as well as the people who own 911truth.org -- what they are doing is already huge.. if we keep making smaller and smaller groups we will never get anywhere... we need one massive group not a bunch of them that will ultimately get nowhere. Another reason is coz i am not nearly as reliable of a source as the people who started 911truth... and I dont have any real archives of documented data... anything I use would be off of their websites... You have to understand there is an overwhelming amount of things that dont make sense in the original story of 9-11... you only read part of them... and people do their own research... i think there was a journalist who came to conclusions which pointed to the same thing only using mainstream sources of news.. considered heavily respectable and reliable by republicans. There are so many people working on investigating the storys... they are doing it in different ways... some are more biased than others... and the website does seem to have its mind set that what they are investigating is true, but the intentions of the group are only for a full scale investigation by those who have the real funds to conduct these large scale investigations... mainstream news channels, etc. See here is what being from texas has to do with things... its just the culture of the people there... close to the border... southern state... and dont act like people dont ride horses and bulls and wear cowboy hats in texas... they damn well do... So the culture there does breed a lot of stereotypical texan cowboys.. but it also breeds a lot of dissent... a lot of the most radical people are from texas... like for example, you send your kids to a christian school but because of all the strictness they rebel from the church because they are sick of the 'bullshit'... the more strict places breed the most dissent... so not everyone is a cowboy hat and a stereotypical idiot, but a lot of people are. I got frenz in texas. they are smart. Chill
It does, because this thread could get interesting (not suggesting from anything i have to add), with input from you both. Not some bitch fight, about a point i bet you have bitched about before. If you have not bitched about 'being texan' and wish for a few pages, ok go ahead. Another thread wasted.
^^no. im gonna let Mui think what he wants and if he actually believes we ride cowboys and all that other shit in Houston, hes an idiot.
you cant deny people ride cowboys and bulls in texas... that doesnt mean you do tho... and i never said anything about houston
The intricacies of the social groups and their practices in that Midwestern State called Texas...Fascinating
i dont live in a town. you made it seem liek everyone rides horses. how the fuck do you ride a cowboy? drop this shit already, youre not gonna see anyone ridin a horse in the city
no, it's not about radiation. something 2 do with the fact that the plane is moving too quickly for the transmitter to know where to return the signal. i suggest u read professor dewdney's research if u haven't already.
I understand the logic behind 'the plane moving to quickly' , but i thought cell phones were once allowed, and now are not; because of the 'radiation'. I appreciate that it might be the FAA covering there backs . I ask what phones, because the one he used might be shit. The ACTUAl ones used might be a lot better. I only posted the 'radiation' 'quote' because Phones once were alowed up in the air so possibly they can operate at such altitudes. Random thats me..