America's most respected lawyers and legal scholars disagree with your statement. The American Bar Association says Trump's appointees to the bench are not qualified to serve.
You are wrong again. The Audio tapes and all other evidence from Lev Parnas was under seal by orders of the court. He was not allowed to release anything. The Judge lifted the seal only a few days ago and the lawyer for Parnas started releasing information. That's how Rachel Maddow got the interview with Parnas. During that interview the lawyer said they were examining all the records and audio tapes and would be releasing every thing. He is defending his client because Trump lied when he said he did not know Parnas. It's obvious Parnas worked for Giuliani and Trump. Parnas is obviously not the liar … don't you agree? Do you remember when Trump lied about Michael Cohen and that porn star?
As usual … you are not being honest here. The lawsuit is Clifford v. Essential Consultants, not Donald Trump. Essential was a false front set up by Michael Cohen to shield Donald Trump, after he had sex with the porn star. To me, anyone who pays a woman over a hundred thousand dollar for sex is actually engaged in prostitution. But, I'm not the judge. In fact, the judge in this case is a Bush appointee and could be a Republican. The State Bar and its Disciplinary Council should examine that case for bias.
Some of this stuff i've read on twitter and it has the same effect on me. It has me thinking hmmm is Trump trying to cheat on his own wife or is it some sort of malarkey that the democrats are just playing with to try and make people think Trump's a horny bloke? Smells a bit like the stuff used on Bill Clinton when he was impeached.
This is what you are dealing with when you argue with a Trump supporter.. Spend your time with people worthy of it..
You are so correct. It's like they put their fingers in their ears, shut down their brains, and close their eyes. Just like three little???
People spend too much time being divided and picking sides instead of coming together to work on a positive outcome. Whether you like a President or not you should always point out their mistakes when they are wrong and support them when they are doing right.
That sounds pretty much like what the Trump defense team was saying at the impeachment hearings yesterday!
That's true up to a point. What happens though when the President isn't just somebody we don't like but somebody who, in our best judgment, is truly destructive of the values this country was founded on. He is packing the judiciary with unqualified stooges who will be around decades after he's gone, interpreting our laws and Constitution in ways which will put our basic rights in jeopardy. He uses broad claims of executive privilege to keep the U.S. Congress from getting the information it needs to monitor his behavior. He is a pathological liar and has the temperament of a child, and holds the nuclear codes. And he might be in office for five more years. Back in 1776, we could have taken the position that whether we liked King George or not , we should point out his mistakes when he's wrong and support him when he's right. But what the Founders did was decide to dump him and start over. Unfortunately with Trump, there are very few instances when I think he's doing right. and lots of times when I think he's not. And I don't think the latter are "mistakes". He does them on purpose. There are times when we have to speak out, and if that offends folks who have their heads in the sand, so be it!
To each their own. I never said not to get rid of a president if they are getting out of hand. Just saying.
Can we also talk about how he is now threatening political dissenters or potential political dissenters with physical violence Or is threatening to put someone's head on a pike just a figure of speech
What happened to the "Signs Your Kid is Alt Right" post? That was the funniest thing I've seen in a long time