The Donald Trump Score Card

Da Fug?

 

<iframe src="https://www.************/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.************%2Fphoto.php%3Ffbid%3D10157234899894011%26set%3Da.10153300496294011%26type%3D3&width=500" width="500" height="502" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe>

 

Fook

 

Yeah... that's not better

 

Its not so much about Thunberg herself, but her supporters

She wants continued support thats going to include the nuttier environmentalists

Especially first world climate activists, she starts barking at them, telling them they personally arent doing enough, you know whats going to happen

Holding up traffic in the middle of a city so 100,000 cars emit more CO that day, gluing yourself to things isnt the way to go.

Raising money to help the third world afford cleaner energy sources. Build more of those things that clean up the plastic from the atlantic etc etc

 

How are the pussies in the NBA doing?

They still too scared to say bad things about China so they get paid $50 million a year instead of $20 million?

 

So who exactly are these guys running the Trump war room? And Team Trump 2020?

They seem to be funded by Trump himself personally

Which doesnt actually mean Trump is personally approving everything that goes out

Are they solely funded by him, or are we talking about his supporters?

Anyone have a clue as to who they actually are?

 

He essentially is in control of the US Senate. Moscow Mitch self-castrated himself and meekly handed his testicles to Trump long ago.

'Going to take my cues from the president’s lawyers’: McConnell to coordinate with White House on impeachment

 

I still say Schiff showing the Presidents tweets to whats her face in real time is in itself witness tampering

 

Even Trump's supporters have difficulty fathoming his pathological, insatiable vanity.

Trump was one of the top ten finalists of Time's 2019 Person of the Year and later in the top five. He thought he had it in the bag but lost to a teen girl environmental activist. His reactions clearly show that it infuriates him.

He projects his frustrationns onto the girl by telling her to chill out.

His fake Time cover shows that he thought his political acts in 2019 should have made him person of the year.

The doctored Greta Thunberg Time cover praises his border wall that he underhandedly financed with U.S. taxpayer money that was diverted from others via his declared 'national emergency' after he failed to convince a Republican Congress to fund it (the wall he said Mexico would finance). Trump considers that to be an accomplishment.



Who will be TIME's 2019 Person of the Year? See the shortlist
The magazine's editors have announced the contenders who are in the running for the 2019 Person of the Year distinction.
By Scott Stump
Dec. 9, 2019, 8:24 AM EST / Updated Dec. 10, 2019, 7:51 AM EST / Source: TODAY

Who will be TIME's 2019 Person of the Year? See the 5 candidates

 

Did you see the poll?

 

Neither did Nicholas Sandman

 

Justices to take up dispute over subpoenas for Trump records
By MARK SHERMAN
December 13, 2019

Justices to take up dispute over subpoenas for Trump records

excerpt:

"In three separate cases, he has so far lost at every step, but the records have not been turned over pending a final court ruling. Now it will be up to a court that includes two Trump appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, to decide in a case with significant implications regarding a president’s power to refuse a formal request from Congress.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow released a statement saying: “We are pleased that the Supreme Court granted review of the President’s three pending cases. These cases raise significant constitutional issues. We look forward to presenting our written and oral arguments.“

In two earlier cases over presidential power, the justices acted unanimously in requiring President Richard Nixon to turn over White House tapes to the Watergate special prosecutor and in allowing a sexual harassment lawsuit against President Bill Clinton to go forward. In those cases, three Nixon appointees and two Clinton appointees, respectively, voted against the president who chose them for the high court. A fourth Nixon appointee, William Rehnquist, sat out the tapes case because he had worked closely as a Justice Department official with some of the Watergate conspirators whose upcoming trial spurred the subpoena for the Oval Office recordings."

 

Trump's compelling evidence: "Well, that's what the word is."



Why Trump's Senate GOP allies are pushing accusations of Ukraine election meddling
Courtney Subramanian, USA TODAY
Published 5:00 a.m. ET Dec. 14, 2019 | Updated 7:16 a.m. ET Dec. 14, 2019

Republicans float Ukraine meddling theory in Trump impeachment defense

excerpt:

"When it investigated the DNC hack, CrowdStrike concluded the theft was the work of hackers connected to Russian intelligence services. Mueller confirmed those findings in his own probe, indicting 12 Russian military intelligence officers for the hacking scheme, which targeted the DNC and Clinton's presidential campaign as part of the Kremlin's effort to undermine the 2016 election.

But Trump has floated the possibility that Ukraine was behind the hack and framed Russia. He has also claimed – falsely – that CrowdStrike is owned by a wealthy Ukrainian who sought to cover up the crime by refusing to hand over a physical server to the FBI in its own investigation into the DNC hack. Trump has suggested that server is being concealed in Ukraine.

He repeated the claim during a Nov. 22 Fox and Friends interview.

“And I still want to see that server. You know, the FBI has never gotten that server. That’s a big part of this whole thing. Why did they give it to a Ukrainian company?”

When pressed if he believed Ukraine was hiding a server, Trump said: "Well, that’s what the word is.""

 

Why is that important to you down there in Australia?

 

Sandman was engaged in a political action with nearly a hundred other Catholic School students... all in MAGA Hats. There was a second group there for political action … they were the Black Israelites. The Israelites were yelling at the Catholics. Sandman elected to confront a Native American from the Omaha Tribe, who was also protesting and beating a religious drums while chanting prayers. Sandman and his buddies decided to surround the Native man in an obvious intimidation tactic. I saw the videos and he was clearly engaged in political action. Since that day he has been on FOX News am radio several times to promote a multi million dollar lawsuit.

 

Fox & Friends: 'Trump, why did you start a nuclear war with N. Korea and Iran?'

Trump: 'Because they launched nuclear missiles at us. Well, that's what the word is.'

 

If Hong Kong protesters had been selected as Time Person of the Year, Trump would have claimed himself victorious and would have had a fake Time cover made with his face pasted over a protester, similar to his fake photo with his face on the shirtless body of Sylvester Stallone.

Trump might have even put his face on one of the Hong Kong protesters who was seen holding up the photoshopped image of Trump's face on a shirtless Sylvester Stallone. It would be a double-fake fake.


image

 

The Supreme Court just jumped into the political deep end with Trump taxes lawsuit
By Joan Biskupic, CNN Legal Analyst and Supreme Court Biographer
Updated 7:51 PM ET, Fri December 13, 2019

The Supreme Court just jumped into the political deep end with Trump taxes lawsuit - CNNPolitics

excerpt:

"Now, all nine will be thrust into a high-stakes battle between the executive branch and Congress, as well as the longstanding controversy regarding Trump's refusal to make public his tax returns.

None of the three cases involve Trump's official actions as President. They trace to his business dealings before taking office, such as possibly directing "hush money" to women who have claimed they had affairs with him.

In all three cases the justices are scheduled to hear in March, lower court judges grounded their decisions against Trump in decades-old Supreme Court precedent that would allow a President to be subpoenaed or sued. So, any reversal would be startling."

 

One is about the power of federal prosecutors in New York, and the other about the Constitutional Authority of the House Ways and Means Committee. There are no ifs ands or Buts in the Constitution concerning this power.