I heard Donny took alot of stuff out showing him.... I heard they WERE there but then taken.... Why bother taking them?? Why is he afraid?
Probably because they would be politically damaging. Some people might be naive and/or completely ignorant of anthropology and history enough to think that rich and powerful men don’t use those resources to fuck young fertile women at almost every opportunity. I’d be more concerned with whether or not his sexual activities have made him susceptible to blackmail. Given his 180 on various things since being elected a second time, I suspect they might. If not that, then I suspect that the same folks have made it clear to him that he or his progeny can be JFK’d.
Bill Clinton has called for the full release of the Epstein files! Clinton Calls Out Trump’s DOJ Over Epstein File ‘Protection’
Fair enough. Political calculus. He’s a known coke party boy and Epstein client. Further revelations can’t really hurt him, especially at his age and nearness to the grave. Calling for further release of any info that might damage orange-man-bad is a no-brainer for him.
Really? I can't find anybody or anything that suggests Bill Clinton did cocaine, some of his staff yes, his brother yes, but not him. Aides: Clinton Never Used Coke What do you mean, by "Epstein client." Please site the explanation, source and proof for this claim. Regardless Bill is willing to have all the Epstein flies that relate to him released How about Trump, this about Trump, not Clinton?
lol. SOURCE!?!?!tm. Oh boy you sure showed me. You’re absolutely right. Ol’ Willie’s more innocent than a choirboy. He didn’t even inhale. And he probably wasn’t an Epstein client. I’m sure he and Jeff just hung out now and then, watched the local sports-ball team, smoked absolutely-non-Cuban cigars, and sipped Bartles&James wine coolers. Nothing but the most wholesome and socially acceptable recreational activities for good ol’ Willie. He’s the straightest of all the straight arrows and anyone who suggests otherwise has been duped by a “vast right-wing conspiracy” theory. But Orange-man-bad, well, he’s evil incarnate. He has a complete monopoly on evilness. He regularly and habitually rapes innocent young children, in THE most corrupt, racist, and antisemitic ways imaginable! He’s LITERALLY Hitler! He’s a threat to democracy: so much so that we must all do everything we possibly can to prevent people from being allowed to vote for him.
Why are you getting, what seems to me, upset? You made a claim about cocaine usage by Bill Clinton and I asked why you made that claim. Simple. Trump is a convicted felon, in fact he was convicted on 34 counts, not one, thirty four. Trump was also convicted of sexual abuse, defamation, and fraud, I can cite sources if you wish. I can't understand why anyone would vote for a convicted felon and sexual predator.
W We voted for him BECAUSE of the people who hated him. All of the obnoxious little “spiteful mutants” were screeching so hard about how evil he was. That made him all the more appealing. When the censoring leftists, militant feminists, malignant trannies, and other maladaptive deviants of every type are against someone or something, it sends normal people towards it. It’s so funny how the left went from experts in aspirational marketing, with the eloquent platitudes that got a nobody from nowhere to become the first black president, to a party screeching, depraved rejects that sent the public running into the open arms of the aforementioned felon.
So you voted for a felon because you didn't like people pointing out that he was a felon? You voted for him because people are against felony? Felony appeals to you?
Yes. As long as you’re going to completely ignore what I actually said, and restate it to say what you want it to say, then yes. That is exactly why we voted for the felon. Yep I absolutely said in the previous post that we voted for him because he was a felon, because other people pointed out that he was a felon, and because other people are against felony. That is exactly what I wrote. You are absolutely correct. I commend you on your skill at translating from English to English. Truly outstanding.
Bocci, I'm trying to understand. You said you voted for him, " BECAUSE of the people who hated him. All of the obnoxious little “spiteful mutants” were screeching so hard about how evil he was. That made him all the more appealing." You didn't say you (or "we") voted for him because of his policies, accomplishments, intelligence, humanity, humility, good looks, or any other reason. You said "we" voted for him becasue "the obnoxious little 'spiteful mutants' were screeching so hard about how evil he was. That made him all the more appealing. When the censoring leftists, militant feminists, malignant trannies, and other maladaptive deviants of every type are against someone or something, it sends normal people towards it." So, it seems to me that you are telling me that when the people you term as 'spiteful mutants', censoring leftists, militant feminists, malignant trannies, and other maladaptive deviants of every type; in your analyst, hate him, he is worth your vote above any other candidate. Am I right, or wrong? I was pointing out a few of the reasons those you term 'spiteful mutants', censoring leftists, militant feminists, malignant trannies, and other maladaptive deviants of every type might, in your term, "hate" him. And I asked if you voted for him because those you term 'spiteful mutants', censoring leftists, militant feminists, malignant trannies, and other maladaptive deviants of every type might, have a legitimate reason for in your term, "hating" him. So I asked if you (we) voted for a felon because you didn't like people pointing out that he was a felon? Now maybe I'm wrong. I've been wrong a lot of times. So let me ask you this: did you know Trump was a convicted felon when voted for him?
Thank you for taking the time and effort to understand. Yes, I was well aware that he was a convicted felon and I’m confident almost everyone who voted for him was well aware of it as well. There was widely held perception that those prosecutions were politically motivated to both punish him for refusing to fade into the woodwork, as all previous presidents had done, and to serve as a deterrent example for anyone else who might take up his policies in the future. His guilt or innocence of the crimes were largely irrelevant to anyone who was tired of the globalist, warmongering, uniparty.
As to whether he was worth my vote over any other candidate; absolutely. Thanks to the party system, it is always a choice of the lesser of two evils. The left’s policies, to the extent that they had any other than orange-man-bad, were repulsive. Their candidate was only slightly less so. She was clearly a vacuous puppet. For all of trumps flaws, which no doubt number more than I could be bothered to enumerate, he was easily a better candidate. Had the republicans chosen Cruz or Rubio or some other neocon felationist, the choice would have been more difficult but I’d probably have just held my nose as I voted for the one who was less likely to favor castrating children.
So you were aware that you voted to elect a convicted felon. You listened to the widely held perception that those prosecutions were politically motivated. Do you always base your knowledge of the world on widely held opinions without checking for their validity? If you did check what specifically led you to confirm that those prosecutions were politically motivated? You seem to be telling us that you don't care if he is a felon becasue you're tired of the globalist, warmongering, uniparty. What is a globalist, warmongering, uniparty?
What was repulsive about the left’s policies? What were those policies? What specifically led you to believe that Harris was a "vacuous puppet", especially as she has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Economics and a Juris Doctorite. Doesn't sound vacuous to me. Who was "pulling the strings"? Could you do me a favor and list all of Harris' flaws beside all of Trump's flaws and please tell me which of Harris' flaws out weighted those of Trump.
We could have a conversation and actually listen to, and hopefully understand, each others’ perspective or you can engage in pilpul Urban Dictionary: pilpul. The choice is yours. I develop my opinions the same way everyone else does; through experience, education, observation, and whatever meditated information I expose myself to and bother to absorb. I don’t pretend that this is an objective experience. It has, however, helped me make choices that kept me alive and in good health, and allowed me to enjoy and provide well for my family. Your question about what is the globalist warmongering uniparty seems about as disingenuous as asking me what is the color blue.
I don’t believe you are ignorant of what a person of a conservative-libertarian persuasion would find so objectionable about Democrat party policies. As to Harris’ credentials; I have more than enough education, and experience with other educated people, to know that there is only slight correlation these days between education and intelligence or competence. She displayed little of the latter two. One can only imagine what branch of economics she studied: she gives the impression that solving anything more complex than a simple linear equation would be beyond her. As to who was pulling her strings; political insiders and financial/corporate power - the same as any other politician. Going to keep up with this tedious dissection of every single sentence or are you capable of expressing your own perspective without an appeal to authority argument?
MeAgain: Why do you bother with the likes of Bocci?? He and 74 million others have shown ---IMO--exactly what their judgement consists of and what morality means to them. Of course , a guy that can grab a woman's pussy at will and never pay a price has something going for him.
lol. “He and 74 million others…” I do love how democrats think that democracy is only democracy when the vote goes their way and anytime it doesn’t, it’s “a threat to democracy.” lol. Heaven forbid the great unwashed be allowed to vote for what they want rather than what we tell them is best for them. I think you fail to realize that we find trump just as morally, and even behaviorally, deficient as you do. We just like your candidates and policies even less than him and his policies. Let that sink in. We know he’s a scoundrel at best. We just find your policies and politicians so objectionable, that we EASILY prefer him. We don’t like him THAT much (ok maybe we do enjoy his trolling a bit); your side just SUCKS that bad.