The truth about the Iran election

So if "the world is watching" sounds very threatening to you, what do you think of statements like:

Quite friendly, no?

 

My Iranian friends call it Iran.

Did you invite them over to your Ahmedinejad election party?

Just a moment ago you said it was widely condemned. Have you changed your mind already?

Right so in Iran women can get stoned to death for adultery, but you could get busted for smoking dope, so neither of you are free.

OK I see so if you want to buy a house you have to work and save money, which is not fair.

Who forced you to work for a multinational?

You fucking live in a free society and I really wish you could trade places with someone is North Korea would would appreciate it more.

 

Is that supposed to be funny?

Iraq more so than Iran, OKAY. Do I need to spell out everything I mean to you in no uncertain terms every fucking time?

That's just about the long and the short of it, yes. I am supposed to feel grateful now that I am a single white alpha male living in the contrastingly utopian west?

NO, it is not fair. Not if I have to work all my life to pay for a mortgage. Why the fuck should I have to enslave myself into a system that exploits me in everyway, and the environment, to say the least, just to put a fucking roof over my head. This is a BASIC human right!

I have to work for somebody to earn money, and I don't get to choose who I damn well work for, few people have that privelage.

Please go and find a dictionary and read up on the definition of the word "relative"

 

A recent view from The Pilge, about 30 minutes long news interview on American television.

Very interesting and impartial view of the middle east crisis, and the hypocrisy of the Obama administration/ american propaganda.

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/6/filmmaker_journalist_john_pilger_on_honduras

 

You are seriously delusional if you use 'Pilger' and 'impartial' together.

The guy is a hate mongering propagandist. He is a complete disgrace to the profession of journalism.

 

Oh you poor fucking baby ! You have it rough.

It's soo easy, the mold fits you like a glove.

I can't believe you actually think you not being able to smoke hashish without the possible chance of incarceration, to an Iranian protester getting shot dead for speaking out are comparable.
Un-Fucking Real.

 

Yet again, twisting my words round and making them into something they were not intended to be.

This debate has become very stale.

 

Nobody twisted a word you said, you said you don't live in a free society and showed a few lame examples, i only pointed out how lame they/you are.

Again, boo fuckin hoo.

BTW, You Are living in a free society.

 

You've just pretty much concluded yourself to be a grade a fucking tosser, and I intend to just ignore you from now on, unless you decide to grow up and add something constructive to the debate.

We're not in primary school here.

 

The people responsible for this discrepency is probally the same ones pushing for a war with Iran, to bring Russia into it. Since 9-11 they have been building resentment for all middle eatern countries for various reasons, mainly to fund large military projects whichmake billions for them. My idea of the reason for this discrepency is to give them atleast 60% reason to agree with Isreal and thier planned strike against nuclear facilitiy development projects in Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6xApA38InA

Video concerning proof that Isreal is very close to doing what they did in 1980's to Iraq and apparently two years ago to Syria, without any consent from other countries. The way I see it, the people who gain money from war, generate as much resentment in a population, so that people stay bipartisan on the issue. Ie. They go into Iraq after rousing resentment of terrorists, then while there they keep using the resentment to justify the war in the first place, even though there is incontreversial proof that Iraq had no nuclear weapons.

 

You're so deluded you think what you are doing is debating??
Sounds like whining to me, and anyone else who has wasted their time reading your crap.

 

.

 

What else do you know that makes it easy to agree with my point?

 

Nostradamus predicted world war 3 would start in the middle east around this time.

 

I think any sane person would look back and be extremely grateful that Israel carried out both operations successfully.

"They"? Who is they?

You can't think of any reasons people in middle eastern countries would resent their governments other than because the CIA told them to?

 

Seems you guys have been having a nice time.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8128858.stm

 

Odon!!!!

Never in my life have I been so glad to see you old buddy!

 

I remember watching that dcumentary about whats Nostradamus. Actually, my overall feelings of it were that it was true, I eat up that shit. However, I realized that most people would eat this tuff up too and more importantly that it was on a publically televised broadcast - something that changed my point of view about it. I imagine that this type of information is the type of thing that also rouses resentment and a sense of suspicioun, in fact, suspiscion being that type of emotion they would like to create in the general public. The reason is obvious, the more suspiscion the arouse the more reason they have for entering into a war that they have little to no reasons for actualizng. IE. Iraq war and 9-11, things that rouse suspiscion for any potential threat coming from the middle east. In the documentary Nostradamus supposedly was credited for sayng that the twin towers would be attacked AND that the anti-christ would appear from the middle east. Its an interesting documentary if you take it into the context of the types of emotions they need to create in people for them to stay bipartisan on the issue, as many are for the war in Iraq, something that the perpetrators admitted to having created out of false pretenses, instead profit pretenses. Cheney I believe was a main stock holder of the carlyle group, a military company that was the first to be contracted to provide military goods to the states for the Iraq war.

 

I tend to lean towards the prespective that the worlds events are orchastrated by one group, who like Bush's Grandfather, has ties to both sides of a conflict. Ie. He sold military goods to the allies and provided germany with the fuel for their planes. I look at a world issues like some group is not trying to gain power over another, but rather, keep their power over another, namely the elite wealthy over the high, middle and lower wealthy classes. It seems to make more sense and I am left with less questions when trying to understand forqign relations with countries.