Because it hasnt existed so far. Its not about sticking it to the man or Chaos or any of the crap. Its about living without any laws or established form of goverment and being 100% free.
That won't always work right... I mean... people just don't have any fucking judgment to be on their own.
And those people will die. Its nature. Why should we perpetuate a society that has all these people that offer nothing to themselves or others.
Like a 'survival of the fittest' battle? Errr... I don't know how long I'd make it, man, I'm not much of a fighter. Well, I can bitchfight but that's about it.
No no no no no. No. Everyone just lives. No fighting would be needed because there would be no materialism (I mean after the initial crazed looting and pilaging) because after about... a day, eletricity is gone, then gas and oils, etc etc. and people just fend for themselves in shelters and stuff. Its kinda like survivor without the stupidity.
Oh well, We'll just take over Iraq and we'll be set for life with oil... then we can barter with our neighbor to hook their house up to our generator.
Thats not anarchy. Thats a military, which is a construct of an organised rule. This is wrong. There are no armys in anarchy. Mobs on the other hand may form for whatever reason
heh, okay I see what you are saying. But I know there are more than a few folks out to get me, and there would be no cops to stop them. Well, I guess the cops aren't really going to stop them now. However, people's fear of the police has saved me from a ass-kicking more than once. Well, man, if you can get this to be an anarchist country, I shall not complain. I will live in my shelter and fend for myself.
National domination is for the narrow minded. No if we just took over one country, someone would just invade us. Of course there would be mobs of angry people everywhere but we could only last for so long
i agree with the todays anarchism not being real anarchism, but people need a govt to enforce laws and somewhat control their lives. even if people got to live with no govt, someone would just rise up and rule again. also im for violence against govt facilities and things of that sort.
if you dont want the government tracking you while your surfing the net go here: http://www.proxify.biz well i know somebody who is a government agent, but he deals with foreign non war in iraq affairs and he is a really nice guy.
Yes... This is a sad relization I had some time ago. Someone discovered is they proclaimed charge over a group of people they either adheared or decided to be a leader themselves. Humans have forgoten how to be free. Always needing someone to tell them what do, even if its only to oppose them.
i thought we had equal protection, if i threatend to kill a homeless guy outside of my apt. they wouldnt care but if i threatened to kill the president id be arrested
that reminds me of something i've never understood... everyones equal right? but they will do alot more to save the presidents ass than yours... i guess that kind of makes since though, since he's the "leader" or some shit. but what about the presidents family? they are going to get preferential treatment over you too, but why? they are not an important part of the government... they are not needed to lead the country, etc... whatever i'm just rambling. oh yeah, and anarchy is impossible, for the same reason as communism, human nature...
Thats why you work in small froups of anarchists and when someone goes "Alright fuckers I'm in charge now!" You bludgeon him to death with big fuckin rocks.
Exactly what I'm saying. People just have no judgment and they're too fucking stupid for anarchy or communism to ever work... problem is that Bush is too fucking stupid to run the countryto begin with... that's what you do. You take an average american (well... he's a bit above average as much as income goes) and stick them in the white house and they fuck it all up. For once can't we get someone with any damn sense to run this country.