Top Ten (Failed) Proofs For God's Existence

Having and being are the same. Being in our conscious terms is considering and emoting sensational terms. To have love is to love. Giving and receiving then are identical in terms of being. Ours is always a collective bargain and our cause is never distant from ourselves. Attainment is an illusion that makes being seem illusive.

 

Not so complicated to me. That picture of the little boy dead in the surf sums it up for me. Times 100s of thousands only adds to it.

Thanks big guy--we're doing just fine here. Drop by one day, if you can spare the time.

 

I called Imagination the equivalent to the cause, because the Imagination is the aspect that is the very first seed of the manifestation, which is the Thought. Before you know what you want to manifest, you have to be able to imagine and visualize it first.

The Will is the effect that's put into play once the visualization happens. This can be a combination of things, such as doing every day things and/or rituals that surround the first image of Imagination.

But yeah it's just where you choose to draw the lines.

You could also argue that the Imagination and Will are both the cause, and the manifestation and its consequences would be the effect.

 

The flawed Scientific Method: http://www.wired.com/2013/04/whats-wrong-with-the-scientific-method/

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/science/01alch.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

How about experimentation by trial and error? That requires no Scientific Method.

 

Alchemists and Magicians are using Trial and Error all the time.

 

Which aspects? Have you practiced either of the two? No one actually knows the truth about the physical Philosopher's Stone as if it was actually discovered it would have been kept secret so as to not completely ruin economy itself, and the spiritual/internal form of Alchemy is completely legitimate. Meanwhile, Magick produces results. Don't make this argument until you experiment with those practices yourself.

 

You can find your own methods which are suitable for you.

The Scientific Method isn't bad, it's just not THE only possible way to go about things.

 

no "proof" of anything, is ever absolute and final. that's just not the way science, nor the universe we live in, works.
there is only a reasonable level of confidence, where a sufficient preponderance of evidence exits.

(things can and do happen, which contradict every reasonable means of predicting them. and sometimes we can even nudge them a little bit. the problem with that approach, is that outside of science, technology and nature, none of these things are very reliable, and thus have use, only when more reliable methods are unavailable)

 

The reason is the effect of the cause. There is nothing that exists without a cause.

 

that sounds like a reasonable thing to assume. its still an assumption. there is no way to test the whole of it. only isolated parts.

nothing "has to" exist at all. we seem to exist anyway.

 

The cause dictates everything that exists. It "has to" exist, or it wouldn't. Without a cause, you wouldn't exist. The cause is the reason, you are the effect. Cause and effect is fact, not theory. Two always comes after one on the time line.

 

you're just repeating a claim. you've offered no evidence to support it. (neither have i, but that's the point)

 

Here is the evidence.....You are the effect of your parents fucking, which is the cause. You could not exist otherwise.

 

the body i live in is. has nothing to do with who or what i am. and again you've only illustrated one isolated point. but at least you've finally condescended to do that. an elephant could still be a tree or a snake on that basis.