Use of chemical weapons in Syria?

So, no source other than "NATO"?

Again, how has my stance regarding the Constitution changed? You don't think I support a strike on Syria, do you?

 

Well, no you've never said that on this topic specifically, but similar instances like regarding Iran and Libya, you just seem to have a lot more faith in the government than me. I remember which we were talking about, oh- Gaddafi I think. Whereas, I believe Gaddafi was killed for political reasons, and we put the "rebels" in power, all under lies and false pretenses. Gaddafi said his war was on terrorism, and I believe him aswell. (Esp since the Libyan 'rebels' hung an Al Qaeda flag from their capital building.

After all the lies and war propaganda, the government has worn their credibility to the ground. Our government has killed citizens,planned terrorist attacks in the US, made up false pretenses for war multiple times, spied on 75% of people with the NSA by "Accident" and, can't even follow it's own simple little laws here at home.


I have no faith in government, and very very little in the government-controlled mainstream media. In the NDAA they legalized war propaganda. I mean, really think about it. Who benefits from war anywhere? It's not your regular joe who puts his life on the line to make a check, while the military-industrial complex is racking in trillions of debt slips (dollars) to do nothing but start the war, and keep their sons locked up safely! Who benefits from any war? It isn't the people!

 

http://www.voltairenet.org/article178779.html

This one just one of many articles. This is truth.

You can also google "syria 70% assad"