I answered the question you posted in my first paragraph above. Then I asked you a question in the second (lower) paragraph. You have not answered it-again-please do so. Then I will answer yours.
this was one of your biggest propaganda attempts of all.world peace is unlikely to occur while people like you individual continue to state lies about others.you have been as transparent to me from the start as has the op on what ye are really about.
how could you have answered all my questions of today in that paragraph,when i asked you those questions today? quit dancin' summer an give simple straight answers to my questions.
Ive given the fullest answer I could in the first paragragh-what else do you want? What IS your problem about replying to mine?
Stop being silly-I responded to your first post,answering your question ,then asked the one Im trying to get an answer to. Then you ignore that sending a second post asking another question, Stop the avoidance tactics-they won't work.
do you not think its ridiculous to ask someone questions you already know the answers to? why ask what you already know?which i have freely stated without question right from the start of this thread. and no you have not given full answers to todays questions,but instead are chooosing ta hide within an old previous post of yours ,while implying that everything you said in that one also covers my questions of today.
Answer my question roamy,its there in black & white. Stop playing games about 'what I already know' or pretending you've already given the answer in a previous post (if so quote it in a post now). Ive said Ive given the answer to your question,don't see what your problem is with that-you will have to tell me, or show me the post (via a quote) you say I'm hiding behind.
Okay, to break this ridiculous stalemate heres my answer to your second question, afterwhich do you think that you can find the courtesy to answer the one Ive asked you? I suspect that the Thatcher & then Major Governments simpley could not risk a trial of the Bloody Sunday soldiers. That the Blair government was preoccupied with what became the Good Friday Agreement & that the Bloody Sunday crimes were too contraversial at that time,is my guess. Theres little you could say ,in all probability, that I could be in dispute with when it comes to Tory Goverments. They have a similar record on the UK mainland about not prosecuting the criminal activities of police officers. The Forces & the Police are areas the State has always protected to retain their loyalty against the interest of the people in any 'crisis'!
i already answered those questions at the start of your thread,the evidence of that truth is clear to be read by you again in previous posts. once again for the second time,no! i do not see freedom fighters to be terrorists and once again also as i have already stated on previous posts,there are casualties in all wars.
So your answer therefore is 'no'. My answer to your 2nd question is that I believe that the action on that day against unarmed civilians was a terrorist act. I cannot go as far as to say that the British Army are terrorists . My belief was then & is now that their stated mission aim was to protect both communities against the other. On Bloody Sunday that went tragicly wrong & the perpetraitors should be, should have been prosecuted.
i am not playing games and i am not pretending anything.both of those implications are total misrepresentations.
So I'm a liar again. If it were true I daresay I'd have a damnsight easier time of living with it than were I a supporter of terror like you. It accounts for your lies, your venom, the false accusations you make on folk whos strength of charicter you'll never match. Goodluck with your twisted values. I thought I'd feel contempt for you,I just feel pity.
unfourtunately yes.i have told no lies.i own no venom.and i have made no false accusations against anyone.strength of character.ha! ha! is that what you call i?.thank god i'll never match those kind of characteristics.i am a supporter of freedom! from terrorism.not! of! terrorism,but of course you already knew that before you posted this bout of slaunderous crap.whats up! the penny just drop for you on why i was asking you that question,do you consider the british soldiers on good friday to be terrorists?yes,i asked it already knowing that you would never go as far as to telll the truth and call them up for being the terrorists they areits called calling someones bluff!. and bingo!.as you have already said you would not go as far as to call them that.why?because it would be the truth!and i sleep very well as soon as i close my eyes.and by not aknowledging the good friday terrorists to be terrorists,question is how well do you sleep? do you not feel bad about exscusing terrorist acts with"something went terribly wrong that day"nothing went wrong that day! they did it just because they thought could,it was not an act of war.it was an act of pure evil! but you would not go as far as to call them terrorists and for that i think the only person you should be be feeling contempt an pity for is yourself and anyone else who supports same.because in my book that is you supporting terrorism.i knew you would when i posted the question' an now i rest my case! why are'nt we we winning the war on terrorism is very simply answered.because ye are not fighting the war against terrorism!ye are supporting! them.
I have little knowledge of what the facts are relative to the dispute in Ireland so I'm not attempting to justify the actions of one side or the other, and I ask questions of you only to understand your side of the argument which I've yet to determine if it is based on current or past events and their effect on you and your life. When I use the term 'terrorism' I am not referring to an act by either the Irish or the British, but an action directed against people who may be Irish or British, or some of each in some cases.