Was Hitler a vegeterian?

Dude, Hitler was a syphilitic.

That makes people insane.

 

is there any meaning?
being vegetarian doesn't make you mad, or the opposite

 

Hitler was a vegetarian of violence in that he chose the path of violence in order to subdue those types which he abhorred, particuraly the capitalists.
He personaly gave clemency to many communists and even gave some of them allowences.
One of the men who was accused of burning down the Reichstag was freed and declared innocent by Hitler, and given enough money to live on and publish books.
Hitler even sadi that he admired the man and that he was intelegent enough to perserve!
But Hitler and the Germans were infected by the American Capitalist system at the end of the first world war.
The Anglo war machine had infected the Germans with a great hatred, only the British and Americans did not know it, that they had infact incited the Germans to anger, revenge, and spite which they took out on all manner of Jews.
Now the Jews are infected with the hatred the Americans gave to the Germans.
So they take it out on Palestinians under the protection of the White Anglo-Saxon Powers, then the Palestinians take it back out on the Jews.
Who is to blame?
The American structure which has been build over the dead bodies of millions and the capitaly dominated system that must infect all the other nations and incite them to rebelion; becuase as we know, only a select few able to fully enjoy the lavish life of unfettered capitalism, the rest must have the leftovers.
And this is what we are to "teach the Arabs?"
That is a recipe for disastor for Western civilization and Western society is still built on a solid jello, but it is a finely constrocted matrix intended to "work correctly" for those at the top!
But for more down to earth societies this can destroy their social network within a couple generations of eccesive greed.
Whites can only digest the greed better, but for others who are not accostume to the fine construction of the "Western perspective" can preety much lose their mind, and eventually blow up the world, all becuase of the West!

Anyhow, I think Hitler tryed to conqure the West, and he used the idea of race to do it just like the hippies used drugs, art, and music to draw in their followers.
Hitler once said that he wanted the German Youth to march on America along with the British together agianst America, and treat the Americans only slightly better than they had treat the Native Americans.
Well, The British never invaded America with bombs but they did with music, also inspired by the black rockin music, and incited American youth to rebelion, a great distortion of Hitlers original vision, but that is why he lost the war, so the hippies could have a little fun, how nice of him!
I mean the man worked with the tools which his generation set out, and race brought people together back then, it was something even the enemies of Hitler upheld.
Hitler lost becuase he tryed to conquer the conquerers and that is impossible.
He even rallied non-white races in order to fight his "masonic Jewish enemies".
Well War has been tryed and Peace have been tryed, one worked for three years 66 to 69, and the other "lasted 12".
Capitalism simply will not budge, not untill the planet exterminated the human race and possibly all other forms of life would capitaism die.
that puts all life in danger just becuase some white devils have to fuck with reality, what fuckin assholes!
Mabey Aryans of all colors, races, and creeds should unite together and kick these negetive white neaderthals asses!
The Angrogenous Race that has existed since Atlantis and that has infected many other peoples through sex which also transmits creative atributes.
But the neanderthal White Man does not understand, he just cannot do it.
If only he would smoke some weed he might feel a little Godly but instead old paleface from the Caucus mountains (as opposed to the Atlantian from the tropics) needs to burn marijuana in big fires while he persecutes all nature.
The Children of Creativity should just do their thing and with creativity, never with bombs, you can not beat the king of terror with terror, for his terror is greater, and you could end your life a broken soul like Hitler was and many before him.
So those of us who know our thoughts could transform the world will continue to serve those who destroy both artists, and eventually art?

One thing is for sure, those who were conquering Hitler were not the vegetarians!

And neither were the Germans.

 

The other day I noticed that "The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler" was posted on a website.
I could not read it without haveing to smoke a lot of pot and even a couple sips of brandy to boot.
I was stunned!
Hitler rants against continental colonialism (as opossed to continental "living space" I suppose).
He claims that continental colonialism is both "against the will of nature" and criminal becuase it "bankrupts the master country".
He also claims that "each continental race must create living space".
Not to mention the fact that he rages against the crimes of the White Race!
Segment 3 is particuarly anti-white.

Truly shocking.

Who the hell was this guy anyway?

I can see racists in the south burning swastika flags for the stuff he says here.
Must be a real embarasment for the White Surpemest Neo-Nazi types!



[size=+3]3[/size]

Colonial enterprises exhaust a nation's strength - The new worlds are only excrescences on the old - The white races suffer a set-back - Materialism, alcoholism, fanaticism and syphilis - Unnatural sons - Germany's sole possible direction for expansion eastwards - Europe for the Europeans - The super-abundance of prolific Asia ​

7th February 1945​

Any people which desires to prosper should remain linked to its own soil. A man should never lose contact with the soil upon which he had the honour of being born. He should not go away except for a short while and always with the intention of returning. The British who became colonizers of necessity, and who, indeed, were great colonizers, have generally obeyed this rule.
As far as continental people are concerned, I am sure that it is important that they should expand only in those directions where it is certain that the soil of conquerors and conquered are contiguous.
This need to become properly enrooted applies to all continental peoples and particularly, in my opinion to the German people. And that most probably explains why we have never really felt the urge to become colonizers. A glance at history, both ancient and modern, will show that overseas enterprises have always in the long run impoverished those who undertook them. They have all, in the end, been exhausted by their efforts; and, in the inevitable nature of things, they have all succumbed to forces to which either they have themselves given birth or which they have themselves re-awakened. What better example of this than the Greeks?
What was true for the ancient Greeks remains equally true for all Europeans in modern times. To prosper, a people must concentrate its efforts on its own country. A scrutiny of any reasonably long period of history will reveal facts which confirm the truth of this contention.
Spain, France and Britain have all enfeebled, devitalized and drained themselves in these vain colonial enterprises. The continents to which Spain and Britain gave birth, which they created piece by piece, have today acquired a completely independent way of life and a completely egoistical outlook. Even so, they are but artificial worlds, with neither a soul, a culture or a civilization of their own; and judged from that point of view, they are nothing more than excrescences.
It is, of course, possible to make out a case for the success achieved in peopling continents which before had been empty. The United States and Australia afford good examples. Success, certainly - but only on the material side. They are artificial edifices, bodies without age, of which it is impossible to say whether they are still in a state of infancy or whether they have already been touched by senility. In those continents which were inhabited, failure has been even more marked. In them, the white races have imposed their will by force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants has been negligible; the Hindus have remained Hindus, the Chinese have remained Chinese, and the Moslems are still Moslems. There have been no profound transformations, and such changes as have occurred are less marked in the religious field, notwithstanding the tremendous efforts of the Christian missionaries, than in any other. There have been a few odd conversions the sincerity of which are open to considerable doubt-except, perhaps in the case of a few simpletons and mentally deficients. The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by us, to rise and drive us out. Indeed, it looks almost as though they had awakened solely and simply for that purpose! Can anyone assert that colonization has increased the number of Christians in the world? Where are those conversions en masse which mark the success of Islam? Here and there one finds isolated islets of Christians, Christians in name, that is, rather than by conviction; and that is the sum total of the successes of this magnificent Christian religion, the guardian of supreme Truth!
Taking everything into consideration, Europe's policy of colonization has ended in a complete failure. I have not forgotten the one instance of apparent success, but a success that is purely material, and it is of that monster which calls itself the United States that I wish to talk. And monster is the only possible name for it! At a time when the whole of Europe - their own mother - is fighting desperately to ward off the bolshevist peril, the United States, guided by the Jew-ridden Roosevelt, can think of nothing better to do than to place their fabulous material resources at the disposal of these Asiatic barbarians, who are determined to strangle her. Looking back, I am deeply distressed at the thought of those millions of Germans, men of good faith, who emigrated to the United States and who are now the backbone of the country. For these men, mark you, are not merely good Germans, lost to their fatherland; rather, they have become enemies, more implacably hostile than any others. The German emigrant retains, it is true, his qualities of industry and hard work, but he very quickly loses his soul. There is nothing more unnatural than a German who has become an expatriate.
In the future we must guard against these haemorrhages of German blood. It is eastwards, only and always eastwards, that the veins of our race must expand. It is the direction which Nature herself has decreed for the expansion of the German peoples. The rigorous climate with which the East confronts them allows them to retain their qualities as hardy and virile men; and the vivid contrasts they find there helps to keep fresh their love and their longing for their own country. Transplant a German to Kiev, and he remains a perfect German. But transplant him to Miami, and you make a degenerate of him - in other words, an American.
Since colonization is not an activity which Germans feel called upon to pursue, Germany should never make common cause with the colonizing nations and should always abstain from supporting them in their colonial aspirations. What we want, is a Monroe doctrine in Europe. `Europe for the Europeans!' a doctrine, the corollary of which should be that Europeans refrain from meddling in the affairs of other continents.
The descendants of the convicts in Australia should inspire in us nothing but a feeling of supreme indifference. If their vitality is not strong enough to enable them to increase at a rate proportionate to the size of the territories they occupy, that is their own look out, and it is no use their appealing to us for help. For my own part, I have no objection at all to seeing the surplus populations of prolific Asia being drawn, as to a magnet, to their empty spaces. Let them all work out their own salvation! And let me repeat - it is nothing to do with us.






Well there goes the biggest racist and warmongerer in history!

It is so wise Hitler must have been a Jew!
Why did he have to be a racist and hate the Jews?
His other ideas were so hip and up with the times!

He would have laughed tears of blood to see the Americans in their Imperial enterprizes following WWII ("the war to end all war").
To Vietnam and the Americans of all colors and creeds he would have said "I told you so".
By the 1960's Hitler would certianly have retired and returned to painting, advocating vegetarianism, writing books on world peace, traveling to India with Savitri Devi and God knows what else.
And the German Youth would have been enjoying peace by the 1960's, over the dead bodies of Slavs, Jews, and Capitalist-Christian-KKK Whitesall peoples who love black people by the way, the kind of white people that would treat poor black man with kindness and generosity; the kind of whites that would admire black people almost as much as Leni Refenshtal, for purely artistic purposes ofcourse.)

Peace was to be the birth right of the genreations of youth by the 60's, the reward for the sacrifice of all the wars, finally some peace, so that a Capitalist Christian Whiteman can create in peace right?
WRONG!
Atlantian creates?
YES!
Beatifull people fight evil men to create?
YES!
Germans truly want war?
NO!
Americans secretly developed love of war for capitalist sake?
YES!
Germans fought in war to defend ideals and their leader, a failed artist of rare talent?
YES!
Wagnerist, folkish, Wandervogel Germans fight Puritin Capitalist Whites to make more art, music and philosophy in future?
YES!
For peace?
Ahhuh!
Instaed the youth of America decided to go on a holiday following the collapse of the Riech, instaed of lasting one cycle (that of 1000 years), it did not even last 12.
Once the LSD wore off it was back to work, away with ideals, and fascism is fashionable!
Anyway, Hitler commanded people of the future to reject the colonization of the White Race through the poisons it gives to it's subjects.
I wonder if he would have legalized bud?
Probably only in peacetime.

 

Here is from chapter 14 Adolf hitler's Political testament :

"American affairs are no business of ours, and I should be completely indifferent to what happens to them, but for the fact that their attitude has direct repercussions on our destiny and on that of Europe.
The fact that neither we nor they have any colonial policy is yet another characteristic which should unite us. The Germans have never really felt the imperialist urge.
I regard the efforts made at the end of the nineteenth century as a fortuitous accident in our history. Our defeat in I9I8 had at least the fortunate consequences that it stopped us from pursuing the course into which the Germans had foolishly allowed themselves to be led, influenced by the example of the French and the British and jealous of ä success which they had not the wit to realize was purely transitory.
It is to the credit of the Third Reich that we did not look back with any nostalgia to a past that we have discarded. We have on the contrary turned our eyes resolutely and bravely towards the future, towards the creation of great homogeneous entities and a great Continental policy. It is, incidentally, a policy on all fours with the traditional American policy of not meddling in the affairs of other continents and forbidding others to meddle in the affairs of the New World".


Very interesting, non wonder non-whites treated Hitler and his nationaly militaristic dreamers as though he was a God come to liberate them.

 

Why did Hitler never use the term "white Man" or "White Race" in his speeches where he praised Aryans?
The only time he mentioned the "white race" he was either giving it a left handed compliment or a downright compliant!

 

Hitler was a vegetarianist, not a vegan, but also followed a very weird diet, mostly based on sweets and confectionery . He hated smoke and didnt allow smoking people in his presence. Also he was addicted to anphetamines. His love for animals was limited to his dogs, because they did obey him, and these are his words.
Vegetarianism has nothing to do with his mind issues, i believe.

 

btw, very OT, drug issues were commong among the nazi, remember goerings lifelong habit with morphine.

They widely used drugs to boost their soldiers' performances too. http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,354606,00.html
Here my explaination of nazism: a deadly cocktail of hatred, bad drugs and modern warfare.