What's The Deal With Education?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nerdanderthal, May 6, 2015.

  1. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    Yeah a sharp mind, a search engine, knowledge of logical fallacies, and the socratic method are all you need.
     
  2. Irminsul

    Irminsul Valkyrie

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    194
    What's the deal with ovaltine?
    The tin is round. The cup is round. They should call it.. Roundtine.

    That's gold Jerry, gold!
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Balbus

    Balbus Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,152
    Likes Received:
    2,672
    Indie



    Yes but back in the 1950’s taxes were much higher and anyway your family was reasonably well off.
     
  4. Balbus

    Balbus Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,152
    Likes Received:
    2,672
    Ace



    Can you back this up, I mean what are you basing this viewpoint on?



    In what way did you ascertain their credibility?



    What is ‘intellectual laziness’?
     
  5. GeorgeJetStoned

    GeorgeJetStoned Odd Member

    Messages:
    2,426
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    It's when people who know better choose the easiest path anyway. Or when they don't even bother checking facts before making assumptions.

    For example, a bunch of people see a black guy running....
    Cop: "He must have done something illegal, get the guns"
    Scout: "I wonder if anyone has signed him yet"
    Teacher: "He should have gotten up earlier"
    Shoe Salesman: "Are those Jordans"

    It also occurs when someone has the answer to a problem, but withholds it from the group so they won't have to get involved.
     
  6. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    Your refusal to acknowledge or investigate various false flags that have happened throughout history is intellectual laziness.

    Leaning on terms like "conspiracy theorist", which is propogated by the government is intellectual laziness.

    Relying on anecdotal examples instead of statistical analysis is intellectual laziness.
     
  7. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    Found a great video on "The Prussian Education System"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZp7eVJNJuw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVqMAlgAnlo&feature=youtu.be
     
  8. Balbus

    Balbus Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,152
    Likes Received:
    2,672
    [SIZE=11pt]Nerd[/SIZE]

    [SIZE=11pt][/SIZE]
    LOL sorry it’s not possible to have a serious discussion about politics with a conspiracy theorists because it is like trying to have an historical debate with someone that passionately believe that Gandalf the Grey, Conon the Barbarian, and Xena: Warrior Princess are real historical figures – it can be superficially amusing but is completely pointless.

    [SIZE=11pt]It’s not ‘intellectual laziness’ - I’ve been there and done that and even have the t-shirt - it’s just that I learnt from the experience that life is too short to be stuck in a conversation with fantasists. [/SIZE]

    [SIZE=11pt][/SIZE]
    Is this about your racist belief that black people are inferior human beings compared to the whiter sort?
     
    3 people like this.
  9. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    Balbus lol

    Don't be a sheep.

    Bahahahahahahalbus. Don't go with the mindless herd Bahahahahalbus.

    The Prussian Education System has worked wonders on you. The obedience is strong with this one.
     
  10. Balbus

    Balbus Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,152
    Likes Received:
    2,672
    Nerd



    And your replies speaks volumes about the benefits of your own educational model.

    I mean your views don’t seem to be standing up very well since you seem to run away from criticism or fall back on conspiracy theory.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,864
    Likes Received:
    15,050
    So what did the Prussian system give us and what have we retained?

    From the Prussian model:

    Free primary and secondary education for all. This is currently under attack by the conservative right. They wish to funnel public funds into private schools controlled by private enterprise for profit and private indoctrination.
    Professional teachers trained in specialized colleges. This is currently under attack by the conservative right. Private schools usually need no accredited teachers. Anyone can teach.
    A basic salary for teachers and recognition of teaching as a profession. Teachers are paid too much. They have too many rights, they are lazy and don't want to get a real job. They don't deserve professional organizations as all they are for is to promote lifetime jobs for everyone, even the incompetent.
    An extended school year. Screw that. Home school or cyber school is all ya need. And it's way cheaper.
    Funding to build schools. Well that's mostly for soccer and football fields now.
    Supervision at national and classroom level to ensure quality instruction. This one is a good idea, but the politicians are screwing it up with "No Child Left Behind".
    Curriculum inculcating a strong national identity, involvement of science and technology. Nothing wrong with science and technology, and I do believe the strong national identity is now becoming a world identity, which the right will see as a New World Order.
    Secular instruction (but with religion as a topic included in the curriculum). In the U.S. we don't allow specific religious instruction in the public schools.

    In the 20th century the progressive educational movement de-emphasized the social cohesion aspects of the Prussian system and instituted the promotion of individuality and creativity.
    And so on.

    It might seen like a good idea to have all Summerhill type schools based on democracy and student freedom, but Summerhill only has 83 students and charges about $13,000 U.S dollars a year per student, which virtually guarantees that they get the pick of the litter. In addition they refuse to disclose how their students' rate in comparison with others.
    So scale that up to 49.5 million public school students in the U.S.

    Good luck.
     
  12. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    High School diploma..... 9% in 1910, 40% in 1935. Citing a high school diploma as a certification of proficiency is rather short cited. What do you think about the falling standards? They're probably even worse at University now, but high schools are awful as well. Do you realize how incompetent your average high school graduate or even college diploma holder is? Do you really think it's a coincidence that No Child Left Behind and Common Core are horrendous failures? Do you think the next set of universalized standards will magically fix all the broken kids? The next solution from the corporate left will be different yeah?

    Do any of you deny that obedience is the number priority for schools to instill? Soldiers have been thinking too much for themselves. We really need to set up an 8 or 12 year program where they learn to always do what the authorities say. "I pledge allegiane to the flag, of the Corporate States of America. I will dive headfirst into whatever meatgrinder the officers send me into, without questioning the morality of our nation's motives. I have been conditioned to accept these truths, and am happy to fight in Korea and Vietnam and Iraq and Iran. The leaders know best, for liberty and justice for all."
     
  13. NoxiousGas

    NoxiousGas Old Fart

    Messages:
    8,382
    Likes Received:
    2,389
    So true. still waiting for Nerd to answer the questions that I and others raised in what I believe was his first post about that lame map.
     
  14. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    My evidence isn't perfect. No evidence is. Would you be so kind as to post any counter-evidence?

    Treat debates like a civil trial. The weight of the evidence wins. So far you have not added any weight at all to your side of the scale. I'm not saying you're an intellectual lightweight, I'm just asking for you to present any amount of evidence.
     
  15. AceK

    AceK Scientia Potentia Est

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    961
    I'd say they should at least call it Binygvar! or something ... but that's still not good enough ;)
     
  16. BlackBillBlake

    BlackBillBlake resigned HipForums Supporter

    Messages:
    11,504
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    Up to a point as part of my studies of sociology. Spent a lot of time on critical theories. I think the system has undergone considerable dumbing down since I was a student, but if you selected the right courses such as sociology or philosophy you would learn some critical thinking skills.
     
  17. MeAgain

    MeAgain Dazed & Confused Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator

    Messages:
    20,864
    Likes Received:
    15,050
    Standards are actually greater now tha before, but they are misdirected. With NCLB every student was required to test at grade level in reading and math, that can never happen unless the standard for grade level is lowered to the level of the lowest student as ALL students are required to meet those goals, even those who have no desire to learn or are mentally handicapped (special ed).

    Each school must make a Average Yearly Progress goal on a standardized test. 95% of the students must participate in the tests. By 2014 ALL students (100%) would have to be proficient. Failure to meet those goals after two years placed the school on a "Need to Improve" list. After being placed on the list schools would have to devote 20% of their Title I funding to improving the teachers at the school, offer tutoring and other services AND public school choice must be initiated. All teachers must be certified and licensed, and pass standardized tests, unlike private school teachers.

    So one of the first effects is to have the brighter, wealthier students leave the failing school to attend a higher scoring school, thus weakening the lower scoring school farther as it now has a larger group of lower standard students to average.
    In the district I lived in there were two high schools, A and B. A was the showcase for Bush's NCLB, as it was a high scorer. Baby Bush even visited A to showcase how well it worked. (He traveled with his own porta-potty BTW) A scored so well because the school board had redrawn the district lines so that most of the lower earning families went to the other high school, B. B also received all the discipline problems, Special Ed students and English as a second language students. It also consistently received less money for sports and other non instructive activities. Eventually building A was turned into a middle school and a new building was built in the country. B still has the same building.

    As the AYP goal advances toward 100%, stiffer penalties are placed on the failing school, such as removal of teachers and principals and an eventual takeover by the state.

    Now, to meet the impossible standards the schools did not have the option of expelling disruptive students, all students must be taught either in the school building itself or through special costly programs, unlike private schools, which just eliminate low scorers and discipline problems by expulsion or limiting access through high standards of admission and high cost of enrollment.
    So they began cutting "unneeded" classes such as Art, Music, Foreign Languages, any type of Philosophy, Home and Consumer Ed, and even Science electives in order to concentrate on Math and English. Pressure is applied on teachers to teach to the test and avoid any other material. Teachers who don't produce results are transferred or given lower assignments. (So if you're teaching a class that has several structural problems, such as a higher number of ESL, IEP, or discipline problem students, no matter what you do you will have poorer results than a class full of well adjusted College Prep students).

    All of this has led to low moral in the effected schools by teachers, administrators, and students, a lowering of internal standards as teachers are expected to product all "A" students in every class and the only way to do that is to lower the requirements for achieving an A (dumbing down the classroom). Creative accounting of student enrollment to reclassify "In Need" students and dropouts, and outright cheating on the standardized tests as we saw in the Atlanta scandal.

    In addition, discipline has fallen, not risen as the Nerd has implied in the public schools. Corporal punishment is gone, expulsion is extremely difficult, Loco Parentis is passe, and with Inclusion mandates classes are no long homogenous but heterogeneous which means special ed, honors students, discipline problems, and ESL students are all in the same classroom leading to low performing students who can't keep up, honors students who are bored, and teachers who are swamped in paperwork making up multiple versions of tests and handouts tailored to each students needs and continuous reports and alterations to instructional techniques.

    Discipline and critical thinking is at an all time low and the public system is being systematically wreaked by those anti Reformation and Enlightenment Right Wing forces who think they are preserving morals and Right Wing values by eliminating the very things that allowed the U.S. public schools to to be the envy of the world.
    As Charter and Private schools drain the Public system of its funding and brightest students, the public system will sink ever lower in an inevitable downward spiral will will only lead the Right Wing pundits to say "I told you so" as it is they who are the cause.

    Obedience is not the number one priority, preserving the Right Wing agenda is.
     
  18. fraggle_rock

    fraggle_rock Member

    Messages:
    1,202
    Likes Received:
    558
    The video isn't bashing the concept of a public school system as much as the OP would like.
    It's talking about a need for change within that system.

    To me, it makes more sense to scrap standardized testing (which was introduced by the notorious left winger George W Bush) and reform the entire education system to be more socialist. In fact, in certain teacher's colleges they are preaching the wonders of Lev Vygotsky, who revamped the entire Soviet education system and paved the way for its transformation from poor agrarian society to world superpower by focusing on social learning. Social learning theory emphasizes groups and relationships with peers, and is a move away from the lecture type of education that always produces rigid, suffocating learning environments.

    The problem isn't the phenomenon of public education, it's that it's being designed by capitalists who need drones who shut up and do what they say, because those are the type of people who help to maintain the status quo that gives them their power.

    I definitely wouldn't trust youtube to teach my kids about the world... there is a lot of propaganda and ridiculous conspiracy BS on there and no way to filter it out or discern one thing from another.

    The best way to adapt to the current job market is a strong welfare system and free higher education. It is absolutely insane to expect kids to shell out thousands or tens of thousands of dollars that they don't have to buy qualifications for jobs that they might not even get, and then blame them for being poor and not 'pulling themselves up by their bootstraps' when student loan debt and joblessness ruin their lives. If they didn't have to have so many anxieties about their basic survival and knew that they could always afford the education they need to find work, there would be more room for experimentation, more room for innovation and overall we would be living in a much better society.

    Sooner or later we're going to have to face the fact that there are no longer ANY truly secure fields of employment, and society needs to be more about PEOPLE than profit, and that working simply for the sake of working makes absolutely no rational sense.
     
    3 people like this.
  19. Nerdanderthal

    Nerdanderthal Members

    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    92
    This is an argument for universal income, which will be necessary as every menial labor job becomes automated. Robots will cost 1/100th of the price you'll pay for people soon enough. The companies that don't automatize will die.

    I don't have a big problem with this in theory, but in practice I foresee less and less freedom for people. As people become dependent on the state, the state tends to exploit the people more and more. We've seen it again and agian. The state is under the control of the capatalists and always has been.
     
  20. fraggle_rock

    fraggle_rock Member

    Messages:
    1,202
    Likes Received:
    558
    It's not even just automatization-- by 2040, AI will be better equipped to manage businesses than human managers, and that includes CEOs. Machines will be able to poll people (or just use Google searches), identify their needs, and then invent, mass market and/or distribute products as needed. Once they master the art of advertising and probably subtle forms of mind control, they can create as many wants as they can in order to make money.

    But no one is going to buy their products if nobody has any money, so basic income is inevitable. But what definitely needs to go is the capitalist free market mindset. It is so painfully and absurdly obsolete that clinging to it is doing real harm to society. We need to admit to ourselves that businesses are about making money, not creating jobs and realize that society is perfectly capable of functioning without the need to make ourselves more affordable than machines or Chinese slaves or invent new crap for each other to consume that doesn't add any benefit to our lives whatsoever.

    Government doesn't NEED to be evil... the problem is we've had this whole neoconservative thing since the 80s that has completely f--ked everything up. Education doesn't NEED to be about trying to get a job that will help you to survive... it can also be about personal development, spiritual development, creativity, culture, art, etc. All of these things have been actively de-emphasized by late stage capitalism to the point where most people are cynically making their way through an education system they don't believe in so they can get a job they hate so they don't end up like someone less fortunate. There are people who still enjoy their jobs, of course...

    But yes, I think the entire culture needs a sea change. As long as people are being trained to think that economic success is of the utmost importance, we're always going to have despair and hopelessness.
     
    3 people like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice