Which makes more sense?

Mr.Ree, could you give us a date that reflects the Bible dating?

 

Jerusalem first mentioned in the bible Joshua 10:1
Jerusalem first overrun and set on fire by Judah (Jud 1:8)
Jerusalem plundered by ~ Shislak 884BC; Philistines & Arabs in the "days of Jehoram"; Isrealites 808BC; beseiged by Sennacherib 710BC.
Archeological digs lead to the conclusion that Jerusalem became the capital of a regional state during the course of the 7th century BC), which is 500 years later than biblical dating indicates the supposedly already existing city was overrun and plundered, in which case the "Davidian" bloodline is a concoction.

You are aware that this was a fraud, and that the guy who perpetrated it also made the "james, brother of Jesus" ossuary, as well as having a workshop full of fake relics, aren't you?? Believers will believe anything that supports their belief ~ even lies!!
Israeli police arrest owner of the James ossuary and Joash tablet
After a six-month investigation, Israeli police on Monday arrested antiques collector Oded Golan on charges of fraud, forgery, using forged documents, and perverting the course of justice. In recent days, investigators searched Golan's home and storerooms, including a workroom on his roof where they say he forged antiquities. "A number of other 'antiques' in various stages of production were uncovered," reports the Tel Aviv newspaper Ha'aretz.
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/129/31.0.html

I meant Jerusalem on one point, Nazareth on a following, not concurrently. But point taken. The rest of what you allege, once again, is more your fantasy that reality.

 

My aledged allegations are nothing but a supposed fabrication of suppositions. No matter how fantasmigorical my aledged allegations become via my pontification of the very facts of said allegorical alledgedly fabricated suppositions, they are true in the sense of existence of said pontificated allegorical suppositions.

Seriously though. Not only was what you said misleading and incorrect, what you sited contradicted what you said. The only other major point I made was that you have sited websites in the past that were questionable and did not support your statements, which I pointed out as an intellectual flaw on your part.

Let's correct your usage of the word allege too.

Allege:to assert without proof or before proving

Once again you are wrong. I did not allege anything, because I provided evidence to back up my statements. I have even provided evidence (the definition of allege) that you used the term allege incorrectly. You were only trying to imply that what I said lacked proof, which you seem to do with many ideas until I point out that your "proofs" are incorrect.

I'll check out what you wrote to campbell now...

 

God told me that the King David thing was an exaggeration. Of course, I can't confirm this to you, other than my word.