yea i agree..really it should be who screwed upthe least clinton was best by just not tryintoo hard..lol although even tho he didnt get the universal healthcare fixin the budget so we maybe can have healthcare was an accomplishmemt just sux that the foolcame in & fucked that alltohell if the poll was which president will it take the most to recover from id definately say bush cause alotta his ..no theyre..daddy too but mostly him hs choices ..every 1 of them almost..hs been sowrong that the country can be permenantlky dammaged not to mention the stability of the world he should be impeached arressted & every one of his decisions erased & forgotten & try to start over like his years never existed
Well, Reagan is really responbsible for the whole 'Republican Revolution', and the two Bushes wouldn't have made it to office if it hadn't been for him. So, in a way, you could say Reagan was the best and the worst at the same time.
Not to get into the point that Haliburton most likely would have won the contract in an open bid, being the world leader in logistical operations....but you know how to research the web. Look at Clintons record.
So, they should have won it in an open bid then. Just because you're likely to win an election anyway, doesn't justify fixing the results, know what i mean? And clinton is no better, but i wouldn't call him the worst. The worst is sitting in in an oval shaped office right now.