I do agree that Iran is a big problem,and any and all action(not only by the US,but the rest of the free world too), should be taken 'against' Iran having a nuclear weapon. They are one country that should never have a nuclear weapon.--If the US did not get involved in Iraq,Iran would probably not even have anything close to a nuclear weapon.Iran and Iraq would most likely 'still' be fighting each other.--
It depends on what people mean by "war." Usually when the US goes to "war," it entails the military bombing the hell out of countries that don't even have their own air force. So it's often not a war as much it as a barbaric slaughter of human life. Under Obama, the US has already launched numerous attacks into Pakistan, killing scores of women and children. I see more of this. I don't see the US going to war with Russia. However, they will go back to building up Cold War tensions with Russia to meet their political agenda.
Yes. But in all honesty... the smart thing for the U.S. to do right now is not to get involved in any war while the economy recovers. War doesn't create near as many jobs as it used to these days.
Why? What did Iran do? We don't even know that Iran has nukes. We do know that the US and Israel have them. And which country has used nukes in the past -- Iran or the US?
i think the world will end in 2012 BECAUSE of US military involvement in a country that should not be fucked with...
Since we are going to divert to nukes a bit. The threat with nukes is the abilty to sell them. You dont need a missile to deliver them either, a donkey will do the job just fine.
By that way of thinking maybe Luxembourg or Sweden is too.In other words you are not only wrong but, ah nevermind.
european,you did not understand what I meant.I just used those countries as an example it can apply to a host of other countries too.---Luxembourg,Sweden,Israel are all peace loving countries.The only difference is Israel has to be able to 'defend' themselves,the other 2 do not.