Why Do Dutch People Hate Admitting They Are German

Dutch and German really ain't like Irish-Catholic and Roman-Catholic or even American and British. The Dutch are still there they just see things different. So in some sense it can be associated with all things in that context but America hasn't been British in well over 200 years.

 

How about EVERYTHING


Hotwater

 

so in addition to jihadis, you're suggesting i run around scared of secret nazis too?

i'll pass on the paranoid delusions, thanks. :sunny:

 

That's your choice but its a lot of fun


hotwater

 

Instead of secret santa we can call it secret Nazi

 

they made no secret of their presence to the jews.

 

half the population of briton are gemans.the gemans invaded briton and pushed out the true britons,who are actually the welsh.so if you want to meet a true brit,go to wales.the true brits were a great race of people who wanted war with no one.they are called the welsh.the british royal family are essentially german and if its name had not been changed in 1917 the queen of england might have been called elizabeth sachsen-coburg und gotha.

even price philip even though he has been nicknamed "phil the greek" is actually a scion of the danish-german house of schleswig-holstein-sonderburg gluckburg,which lets face it! is as german as it gets.

 

NEWSFLASH!!!!!

NOBODY CARES!!!!

The real question of interest is;

"Why is it so important for Roamy to put people into little racial/ethnic/cultural boxes?"

Does it make it easier for you to keep track of who to hate?

 

tolerated ! i would consider that to be a very interestingly revealing word.

 

ok lets all name everyone who isnt german

 

the relevance of it is that it is in no small way irrelevant.

 

There's a difference between wanting a war, and fighting a war. The most peaceful people should still be ready to take up arms in defense of their homes and lives.

 

i could'nt agree more.though that in itself is one of the sadest things in war,when peaceful people are forced to take up arms in selfdefence against their persecutors.

 

Life is sad. Depends on how you want to look at it. There is always evil out there, and there is nothing wrong with protecting your way of life. There is something wrong with invading someone else's way of life.

 

yes there is always evil out there and yes its normal for people to protect their ways of life and yes it is completely wrong to to try and invade other peoples ways of life.but the evil have no sense of those moralitys.thats why they think nothing of trying to wipe out whole nations of happy peace loving people.i think the only hope for a world without war for all future generations of children is through proper historical truthful education of facts.why what happened happened and how all people can play a part in stopping the present ongoing wars of today and looking forward towards a future world without war.i believe a world without war is possible if everyone stands up against whats wrong.

 

I don't think that's possible.

What I do think is possible though are societies without war, and societies that are strong enough and courageous enough to repel war from their way of life.

And that's not going to happen with bloated governments, who are the only ones armed. Personal and community level accountability is what's needed. In other words I'm taking hippie idealism a step further into how it can actually be accomplished. And it won't be without a fight. Regardless of education and how many people stand up for what is right, there will always be evil and there will always be power grabbers.

 

i'm not sure what you mean by societies without war.

 

Individual countries or regions that don't participate in war or global politics outside of mutually beneficial trade agreements. And who won't tolerate war brought upon their doorstep.

 

so you mean countries like mine for example.well your saying the same thing i ment,when i said about people standing up against whats wrong.i think all societys should do that,but i don't in some countries thats ever going to happen,simply due to the fact that they are already so brainwashed by their goverments already to believing that the people they themselves wage war with are actually the war starters,when in reality they are not.some wars are brought to people doorsteps through no fault of the country itself,but then their are war acts brought to people doorsteps simply in retaliation of years of war brought upon them by the people they are delivering it back to.which are all good examples of people who refuse to have war brought to their doorsteps any longer.

 

Although I doubt the welsh ever were the only 'true brits' (actually I don't doubt it, they never were the only ones in that regard) they surely haven't been the only true brits since other people settled there and made it their home too.
You may not like it but that doesn't change the fact that a lot of the people and their offspring that settled in England as early as we know but especially from the 5th century and onwards are just as native to england as you are to Ireland.
People who's family lived there for a generation or 2 and have the british nationality are of course not german. It is simple as that. Especially for roamy I will clarify it though:
What this means is that the british royalty has german ancestors, and their german heritage is more fresh than those people that descend from anglosaxon invaders indeed but they are not german, they are british.

I posted this in the heritage thread, but I post it here again because that is were you seem to go wrong in general: