There are always paranoid people who question everything when a major accident or incident happens. That happens all the time in every country. I do enjoy conspiracy theories though so by all means carry on.
i've seen the clip before, and lots of pictures... i'd like this to be explained also... it looks like bomb went off in that section not a plane, no plane parts at all to be seen metal dosent completly disinagrate.
Let me pose this question to you, Matt, and to anyone else that wants to answer. I think the video had a lot of good points (didnt prove anything) however, Dan and I were discussing it and he posed a really good question. If that Boing 757 never crashed at those places, what about all those people that WERE on those flights and DID die on that day?
Christ, take it easy rat, just debating the vid you posted, all seems a lil' lunatic fringe to me, and this just raises more questions, and doesn't answer many at all... lack of proof of something doesn't really prove anything. Like I said maybe I'm being naive, but I find this all really unlikely, and its going to take more then little video of the wreckage, and no produced scrap of plane to prove me to take the leap of faith that our government attacked us. And about the Schippers thing... you ever think our government might just be incompetent?
Oh man, that question will probably open up a whole new list of theories. I think I read somewhere that the gov probably wasn't above shooting the plane down themselves over the ocean somewhere in order to make the pentagon/WTC/9-11 connection, but that seems a little too far fetched. I don't think we'll ever know anything, until maybe 50 years from now when all of those documents and videos are finally declassified and it's too far in the past for the next generation to care about. Think about all the evil shit the gov has done, shit that just over recent years has come to light, and nobody cares now. People should be outraged over that Northwoods bullshit, but they're not. After a few decades, when the truth comes out that our gov really was involved with all this, no body will care then either.
if the gov did set this up and lie about it...dont you think they could lie about the peoples deaths too...im not saying they didnt die...but that maybe the gov had somthing to do with it
Moonshyne... i completly agree with you. Wonka... I dunno. What about people that I have met that lost people that they love from those flights? Does the gov. just have them hostage some where? Ya know what I mean??
i agree, i believe our government did something to that plane...heres another one. that plane that went down in PA that was "maybe" about to hit the white house... there was a passenger on that plane that KNEW how to fly planes... why is it that 40 people couldnt take those three bad guys out and put that guy up there to fly... i think there was a bomb that exploded before that plane even hit the ground.. just my thoughts on that.
I cant help it that Im skeptical. I'm always full of questions about everything and I never accept ANYTHING without thoroughly thinking things through.
This is the million dollar question. I cannot answer that because there is no evidence that points to what happened to them. Like I said, I am not into conspiracy theory, just the facts All I can say is that the damage to the Pentagon in the pictures I have seen is not evident of a plane collision, and the fact the there is no wreckage visible makes it all the more suspicious. And why is the government hiding the various video footage of the plane hitting the building? That would provide a much clearer image than the single piece of grainy footage they provided in the weeks following the attack, seen below. And to think that a hijacker had not only enough skill to fly the plane, but was experienced enough to make a clean hit into a building as short as the Pentagon, is suspicious at best. Most experienced pilots have admitted that it would be difficult to fly a Boeing into a building like the Pentagon, let alone as clean as the one on September 11th, because as you can see, there is absolutely no damage to the ground in front of the impact zone. And even if it was a plane, there would still be debris strewn all over the place, and there isn't. And again, where was NORAD on 9/11? Why were fighters scrambled from the WRONG bases and in the WRONG direction. Something tells me it was more than just a minor, unintentional fuckup.
You might be getting a little too close to the truth now matt....dissent may not be tolerated for much longer. One thing that throws me off about the whole thing....the US government loved that show Frasier right...do you really think they would allow the producer to be on one of those flights?
on the topic; i jus watched The truth and lies of 9/11 by micheal ruppert and dear god anyoneone who hasnt seen it should do, now! its more or less a more trusthworthy and indept F9/11
The million dollar question. hehe. Anyways, one more thing... on that video one of the main ideas was that a military plane was more likely to have flown into the pentagon. On the contrary, another main idea was that there was no plane debris found and no land damage. However, those two ideas are completly contrary to each other... in my mind anyways. Do you have any possible explanation on this?
Definitely! Anyone who thinks this is all conspiracy theory BS need only watch this video, which is actually a lecture Ruppert gave at Portland University back in November of 2001. He has a book coming out later this month, BTW, titled Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, in which he lists Dick Cheney as being the prime suspect behind the 9/11 attacks. And as you can see, people, he doesn't fit the profile of paranoid conspiracy nut, at least not by the way he looks.
I watched it, didn't tell me anything I didn't already know, but it was a nicely made video non-the-less.
I highly doubt that. I also highly doubt you even watched the video, or else maybe you're just getting confused with something else.